What's Broken with the Pirates?

The Pirates started well this year, going 15-9 in April, the fourth-best winning percentage (after the Cubs, Nationals, and Mets) in the National League. They slipped in May, going 14-13, and they're only 1-4 in June. Since winning five straight on May 23-27, they've won only twice in nine games. They're still in second in the Central division, but they trail the Cubs by 9.5 games and are only half a game ahead of the Cardinals.

And it doesn't get any easier in the near term. Tonight the team hosts the Mets for three games. Then they have to fly to Denver for a makeup game against the Rockies on Thursday, then fly back home for a weekend series against the Cardinals, After an off day, they open a six-game road trip with three games in New York and three in Chicago. The last of those games against the Cubs is the ESPN Sunday Night game, so it'll be a last flight back to Pittsburgh to start a four game season against the Giants the next day, followed by four against the Dodgers, then a cross-country flight to close out the month with two games in Seattle.

That's 23 games in 24 games, all but one against teams with winning records (and that one, against the Rockies, features the most idiosyncratic park in the league and is sandwiched between two long flights). And they're banged up; catcher Francisco Cervelli and third baseman David Freese haven't played since being hit by pitches in Thursday's game in Miami.

So what's been the problem? 

Let's look at a few full-year statistics. The Pirates are 30-26. After 56 games last year, they were 31-25, so the overall results have been similar. I'm going to compare the 2016 Pirates to the 2015 Pirates, using full-year 2015 figures vs. year-to-date 2016 numbers. And instead of listing just the raw statistics, I'm also going to include where the team ranks in the 15-team National League. 

(an asterisk indicates that the rank lists how low the team is rather than how high. For example, the 20% strikeout rate on offense is the third lowest in the league, and the relievers' 4.04 ERA is the tenth lowest.)

A few things jump out.

• While the team's rank in runs scored per game is the same as it was last year, the offense is a lot better. The hitters have gone from striking out more than average to being one of the toughest teams to whiff, and they've gone from being infrequent walkers to walking a lot. That's moved them to first in on base percentage. They're also stealing more bases, and more successfully.
• All told, the Pirates are the best-hitting team in the league, arguably. (The Cardinals have the best argument.) Some might say, "Yeah, but they haven't been able to drive runners in." It's true that the team's .267 batting average with runners in scoring position is ten points lower than the overall team average, but that .267 figure is still fourth in the league.
• I didn't include this in the table, but the defense has been better than last year as well. Not a lot better, but better.
• So the problem's been pitching. The Pirates' strategy has been to not give batters a lot of pitches to hit (low Zone %, which is the percentage of pitches in the strike zone) and get them to swing at pitches outside the zone (high Chase %, the percentage of swings on pitches outside the strike zone), resulting in a lot of ground balls (high GB%, the percentage of balls in play that are grounders).
• That strategy's been receding this year. Opposing batters are laying off those outside-the-zone pitches, resulting in more walks and fewer strikeouts. It's also forced the pitchers to pitch more in the zone, resulting in fewer grounders and more homers. 
• In the team's 2-7 skid over the last nine days, the pitching hasn't been great--4.83 starter ERA, 3.86 reliever ERA, striking out just 15% of opposing batters while walking 8%--but the culprit's been the hitting, with a .227/.310/.371 slash line. Chris Stewart (.118), Jordy Mercer (.130), Sean Rodriguez (.154), John Jaso (.190) and Andrew McCutchen (.200) are all batting .200 or less, and all but Rodriguez have slugging percentages of .250 or lower as well. Stewart, Jaso, and Cervelli have combined for zero extra-base hits in 54 at bats. Rodriguez and Stewart have been appearing more than planned due to injuries, so presumably they'll do better with more rest.

It seems reasonable to expect more from the offense, especially as Cervelli and Freese return to the lineup and others shake off nagging injuries. The pitching, though, worries me. It's as if somebody sent out a memo to the other teams in the league over the winter with two words: STOP SWINGING. If the Pirates pitchers can't induce weak contact on outside-the-zone pitches as they have in recent years, the hitters, as good as they are, may struggle to consistently outscore opponents.

Christmas Vacation Catch-Up

I. First Base, Solved. Two days before Christmas, the Pirates signed John Jaso to a two year, $8 million contract. On the surface, this doesn't seem like a defining moment for the 2016 season. Jaso's 32. He's never played in more than 109 games in a season, and over the past three years, he's played an average of 80 games per season. Here are his stats over those years. The last column, the one I labeled POS, lists the positions at which he played, by games.

Year	Age	Tm	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	POS
2013	29	OAK	70	249	207	31	56	12	0	3	21	2	1	38	45	.271	.387	.372	.759	114	48 C, 17 DH, 1 1B
2014	30	OAK	99	344	307	42	81	18	3	9	40	2	0	28	60	.264	.337	.430	.767	118	54 C, 35 DH
2015	31	TBR	70	216	185	23	53	17	0	5	22	1	2	28	39	.286	.380	.459	.839	132	48 DH, 8 OF

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 12/28/2015.

There are two nonintuitive things about the Jaso signing. First, he'll play first base for the Pirates. As you can see, over the past three years, he's played exactly one game at first, and that was in 2013. It also, as it happens, was for one inning. The sum total of the remainder of his experience at first base was a game in 2010 in which he played four innings there. So the Pirates signed a first baseman who's played a total of five innings there in his career.

Second, the Pirates' primary first baseman last year was Pedro Alvarez, who was not offered a contract for 2016. Alvarez hit 27 home runs in 150 games last year. Jaso has hit 27 home runs in the last four seasons combined, covering 347 games.

So the Pirates are replacing a slugging first baseman--career total 19 at bats per home run--with a guy who's pretty much never played the position, hits a homer every 43 at bats, and is four years older than the guy he's replacing.

Before I get into why I think the move makes sense, I want to point out two amusing things about the Pirates signing Jaso. First, on December 14, FanGraphs' Eno Sarris wrote a piece entitled "Finding the Pirates (Another) First Baseman," in which he previewed six first base possibilities for the Pirates, concluding:

But there’s one left-handed player left who is younger than the oldest of these options, better offensively than anyone we’ve mentioned so far, has experience playing the position, and offers the potential of a win and a half of production that would boost the Pirates to average all over the field. His name is John Jaso...He won’t cost a prospect, and he could help patch up the worst hole on the field. Plus, he’d return dreadlocks to the field in Pittsburgh, which is fun, if not valuable by traditional metrics.

In other words, Sarris totally nailed the Jaso pickup by the Bucs. Then, when the deal was announced, FanGraphs' Jeff Sullivan wrote a typically clever column  entitled "Pirates Sign John Jaso, Obviously." His smart analysis includes this gem:

He’s getting two years, and he’s getting $8 million, and if this isn’t the very most Pirates move, it’s at least in the conversation. It doesn’t get much more Pirates than this.

It's true: The Pirates finding a low-budget, nondescript solution to a problem is what they do best, whether it's Francisco Liriano, Jung Ho Kang, or Francisco Cervelli. Here's why I think Jaso will work for the Pirates.

1. Yes, Jaso's had very limited experience at first, but he spent most of his career as a catcher (repeated concussions probably make that a non-starter in Pittsburgh), and catchers often make a smooth transition to first base. Besides, replacing Alvarez at first isn't exactly a high bar defensively.
2. Look at the on base percentage line his stats. His career average is .361, and he's been above .370 in four of his six major league seasons. You know how many Pirates had an on base percentage in 2015 above .370? One: Andrew McCutchen. (Cervelli was at .370, exactly.) The Pirates had a good offense (fourth in the National League in runs scored), but as I've pointed out, a high on base percentage is highly correlated with scoring runs. Jaso will improve the team in that respect.
3. Jaso bats left. The Pirates have only one other left-handed batter in their lineup: right fielder Gregory Polanco. Compare these two batting lines:

Player	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS
Player A	681	616	71	142	31	1	30	88	2	1	51	191	.231	.295	.430	.725
Player B	681	594	75	162	46	2	15	67	3	5	74	139	.273	.357	.433	.790

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 12/28/2015.

Which would you rather have? Obviously, the second batter's better: Way more singles, doubles, and walks compensating for the reduction in home runs. Player A is the Pirates first basemen in 2015. Player B is a hybrid, assuming a platoon of Jaso and Michael Morse. I assumed that the Pirates face, as they did in 2015, about 75% right-handed pitchers and 25% lefties, and I combined Jaso's performance last year against righties (weighted 75%) and Morse's against lefties (weighted 25%). Now, line B is probably overstated, as the Pirates will have batters other than Jaso and Morse get some at bats, and each of them will face a relief pitcher against whom they'll have a platoon disadvantage from time to time. But there's reason to believe that the Jaso/Morse platoon will outperform the Alvarez/Morse/Sean Rodriguez combination of 2015. And that's looking just at offense, not defense.

Finally, Josh Bell is one of the Pirates' top farmhands (ranked No. 34 in baseball before the 2015 season by mlb.com) and the team's first baseman of the future, but he's still raw. He's played only 35 games at AAA, and 2015 was his first season at first base. The Jaso/Morse tandem will keep the position warm as the 23-year-old gains experience in the minors. Once Bell comes up, the Pirates will have a bat to deal at the trade deadline.

II. Andrew McCutchen, Not Solved. The Pirates' best player is signed through 2017, and the club has a certain-to-be-exercised option for 2018 as well. They'll pay McCutchen $13 million in 2016, $14 million in 2017, and $14.75 million in 2018, representing one of the biggest bargains in baseball; he'd probably get twice those amounts on the open market. He turns 32 in October 2018, so the Pirates have him signed for his prime years at below-market prices.

What's wrong with that? Well, it's what happens after the 2018 season. True, he likely won't be the same player then that he is now. This year, at 28, he's showed some signs of slowing down. He batted below .300, with a slugging percentage below .500, for the first time since 2011. With just 11 stolen bases and a 69% success rate, he's really not much of a stolen base threat. He's probably the worst fielder among the Pirates' three outfielders (though, in contrast to the club's defense at first base, that's a pretty high bar). He set a career high for strikeouts in 2015.

But, of course, we're talking about Andrew McCutchen here. He's been the face of franchise that hasn't really had a face since Willie Stargell, and its best all-around player since Barry Bonds and, before him, Roberto Clemente. In an article last week at ESPN, Buster Olney wrote,

It would make sense for the Pirates to sit down with McCutchen and his representatives before the start of the 2016 season, and take their best shot at signing the center fielder to a long-term extension...
Maybe the proposal would provide a platform for talks; maybe McCutchen's side would agree, or at least be willing to haggle some. It's also possible that the Pirates' proposal, within the current context, wouldn't be close to what McCutchen would want in an extension. Maybe McCutchen would prefer to play someplace else, for more money, which is entirely his right...
The sooner there is clarity on this for the Pirates and McCutchen, the better. If McCutchen agreed to terms, then the building anxiety over his situation -- for all involved, including the fans -- would end. (And with time, the price of an extension might only become more expensive).
If the Pirates and McCutchen cannot reach a deal, then the team's leadership would know, moving forward, that his time with the franchise will end. If the Pirates fall behind the Cardinals and Chicago Cubs in the NL Central standings next summer, the team could dangle McCutchen in the July trade market and at least begin the process of assessing what they can get in return for him. They could either move him before July 31, or swap him next winter or the winter of 2017-18, leading up to his free agency.

The idea of Neil Walker leaving Pittsburgh was controversial. Can you imagine the club dealing McCutchen? But that's the dilemma it may face: Sign your best player to a long-term extension that will almost certainly overpay him in the out years, or try to trade an asset whose value decreases with every day he moves closer to free agency after the 2018 World Series.